Polymr
Workflow

The slip lands at 09:14. The recovery is on the buyer queue at 09:17.

Receiving is the workflow where the seconds matter most. An inbound ASN that quietly slips nine days does not announce itself; by the time the buyer notices, the line has already starved. Polymr watches the inbound stream continuously, calculates the downstream impact the moment a slip lands, and surfaces a recovery action (split the PO, expedite from an alternate vendor, replan the WO, or accept the slip and reorder) before the next coffee break.

Every slip lands as an exception with the full downstream impact attached.

The exception queue is what the buyer opens at the start of the shift. Each row shows the affected PO, the delay in days, what is at risk downstream (work orders affected, customer commitments at risk), and a suggested recovery. The impact is calculated the moment the ASN slip is parsed, not after the line stops.

app.polymr.tech/review/exceptions

Exception queue · delay attribution

6 open · sorted by downstream impact · refreshed 09:42

Polymr ERP
POVendor / itemSlipWOsSOsRecovery
PO-84179V-218 · PMR-CN-44 · 440 ea+ 9dWO-1124, WO-1126SO-22418 · 320 eaexpedite via V-244 (lead 7d)
PO-84198V-218 · PMR-4406 · 180 ea+ 4dWO-1131-replan WO-1131 to W23
PO-84142V-201 · PMR-BR-08 · 320 ea+ 2dWO-1124-accept · cover from safety stock
PO-84094V-218 · PMR-4406 · 120 ea+ 6dWO-1126SO-22441 · 80 easplit · 60 ea from V-244 air
PO-84028V-301 · HW-B8-A325+ 1d--no action · within float
PO-83992V-244 · PMR-SR-FK · 240 ea+ 11dWO-1131, WO-1134SO-22418, SO-22456alt-vendor V-218 · trial 50%
3 high-risk rows have auto-drafted recovery POs; awaiting buyer sign.cumulative cost-at-risk: $ 38,420

Recovery is three options, costed, on the same row.

When the buyer opens an exception, the recovery panel shows the three options Polymr considered, each costed against the slip. Split to an alternate vendor, expedite via faster freight, or replan the downstream WO. Each option shows the cost, how much lead time it recovers, and a note on the risk. The buyer picks one; the audit row records which was chosen and which were declined.

app.polymr.tech/review/exceptions/PO-84179/recovery

PO-84179 · recovery options

Slip 9 days · attributed to V-218 capacity · 2 WOs at risk

Polymr ERP
Split to alt-vendorPolymr pick
V-244 · Pacific
Cost
+ $ 92 / unit
Lead
recover 7 of 9 days
Risk
V-244 OTD 88% · 4 prior POs
Expedite freight
V-218 · air freight
Cost
+ $ 1,440 freight
Lead
recover 5 of 9 days
Risk
no quality risk · incumbent
Replan downstream
WO-1124 → W24
Cost
+ $ 480 idle WC
Lead
absorb · 0 days recovered
Risk
SO-22418 commit slips 5d
Decline reasons captured; declined options stay queryable for next similar slip.Approve split · V-244

The MPS view shows what a three-minute detection actually saves.

Before-and-after of one item’s MPS view across the slip event. The plan as of 09:13 on the left, the plan after the ASN slip on the right, with the recovery option folded in. The recalculation fires once; the planner and the buyer see the same numbers.

PMR-4031 . MPSDelay detection . before . after
09:14 to 09:17
Plan as of 09:13
W22280Planned
W23320Planned
W24240Planned
Plan after ASN slip 09:14
W22120Short -160
W230Short -320
W24600Recovery +360
Audit: recompute fired on ASN-7711 at 09:14:02; recovery PO-84231 to V-244 proposed at 09:17.

A takt-driven plant where a single slip cost a shift.

Anonymised engagement with a high-volume supplier. One missed slip would cascade into a full shift lost; the recovery loop pulled detection ahead of impact, and the lost-shift count dropped to near zero within the first six weeks of running.

Anonymized engagement
Operations lead, high-volume automotive supplier (two plants, takt-driven)
Situation
Two stamping-and-assembly plants ran a 38-second takt against forecasted weekly volumes. Daily planner output drove material releases, work-centre assignments, and overtime calls for both sites.
What was breaking
A single inbound resin slip on PMR-4031 cascaded into a 9-day backlog across four downstream WOs before anyone caught it. Planners burned the first two hours of every shift reconciling on-hand against MES-reported scrap before they trusted the morning queue.
  • Demand → planning → purchasing
  • Delay recovery
  • Margin and bottleneck analysis
Outcome · 8 weeks
94.6%
Fill rate
was 88.2%+6.4 pts
Illustrative, reflects this specific deployment. Outcomes vary by plant, stack, and scope.